<OT> Re: we shall remember them

[Matthew Carpenter]

I understand this can be considered subjective, so don't bother replying
with that.
The key difference is that Saddam has proven himself a madman who is not
to be trusted with WMDs.  We have not always done what is right, but I
would venture that we are much more predictable than Saddam or other
terrorist groups.  If you can't see the difference between Saddam and
other, more conscientious regimes, perhaps we should fear you as well...


On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:48:33 -0500
"Robert Black Eagle" <rbe at flash.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Monday 21 October 2002 12:31 am, ronnie gauthier wrote:
> > Uhhh
> > you missed the point.
> > To take care of him BEFORE he has true WMD capabilities.
> > Because my answer to your coffe clutch question(be I sadam) is....go
> > flag yourself.
> 
> By that token, we should invade North Korea tomorrow.  There a far
> "greater" threat if we simply go by the potential of WMD capabilities. 
> Or perhaps we should attack ourselves, since we have far more of those
> WMD than any country in the world.
> 
> - -- 
> Robert Black Eagle
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD4DBQE9tAWytjSYKkYJrmcRArOiAJjZR2zuw+O2k8x1ZBK+oJ30WrYUAJwI0x+t
> TgkT7cCX/cEsvkHhA4S0jA==
> =iVVh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users at linux-sxs.org
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc ->
> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users