libstdc++

[Marvin Dickens]

m.w.chang wrote:

> why didn't it made part of gcc?
>
>> Personally, I would leave libstdc++ library alone. It is used to 
>> statically link c++ code.
>
One lib is for creating static and is another for creating  dynamic (Or 
at least that's
the way I understand it...) Kurt is better qualified than myself to 
explain the how's
and why's of this subject. He has written a couple of books on subject.


Best


Peck

--------

I don't need no stink'n sig....