glibc-2.2.5
Tim Wunder
tim
Mon May 17 11:38:36 PDT 2004
On 10/7/2002 1:08 PM, someone claiming to be Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tim Wunder spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
>
>>Really?
>>My installation of glibc 2.2.5 seems to have rendered me incapable of
>>compiling *anything* on my Caldera e3.1-based system. It's interesting that
>>you seem to have compiled and installed glibc 2.2.5 without incident. What
>>glibc were you running prior to 2.2.5?
>
>
> not sure if you meant me or change twunder.. but I was running 2.2.3 prior. of
> course, this used to be a SuSE box a long time ago..
>
<snip>
I was replying to chang. Since he was upgrading glibc on a eW3.1 box and
was claiming success, I really wanted to know if his success was really
what he thought it was. It seems, though, from a subsequent post by him,
he may be embarking upon the same path to glibc hell that I've been on.
BTW, I managed to find time to install RH 8.0 over the weekend (I happen
to *like* bluecurve -- so sue me...), but haven't had the time to get in
and configure sendmail, my webserver and my web calender yet. Soon, my
compile problems will be solved (well, if not solved, alot closer to
being solvable than what they are now)...
BTW2, are you doing things to the headers of mail messages that cause
Mozilla to be unable to thread things properly? I BCC myself on messages
I send from work (so I have sent mail copies locally when I'm home) and
the BCC's get threaded properly, but the messages that come from the
list aren't.
Regards,
Tim
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list