Now running 2.5.40-bk4

[Bob Raymond]

On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 12:29, Collins wrote:
> Unlike my experiences with the 2.3.x development series (which 
> seemed better and faster than 2.2.x stable series), I have yet to 
> read about anything in 2.5.x that makes me want to swim in this 
> pond before it is  2.6 or 3.0.  Have you found any great benefits?

Sound is much better.  I'm not sure whether I'm getting slower
performance because of XFS or not, but that code seems to be relatively
volatile right now.  Since you're using ext3, I don't see where you'd
have any problems, but I think I'm not going to touch it again until the
XFS code has stabilized a bit more.  Others on LKML have reported more
zip, even on 486 25mhz machines with 8 mb and 0 swap, than 2.4.19.

Bob Raymond