Update GCC from 2.95.2: 2.95.3, 3.1.1, or 3.2?

[Collins]

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:54:46 -0400 Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org>
wrote:
> Well, if you must know, I've considered GenToo, but I want something
> 
> that I can get up and running fairly quickly, as I've other users to
> be concerned about. Once I have RedHat 7.3 running, I'll have
> another spare partition to experiment with. But I think I'll take a
> whack at LFS and BLFS rather than GenToo. That looks like it'd be
> more fun :-), and it can be built without rebooting.
> 

Not  quite shure what you are driving at here???  Both LFS and gentoo
can be built without rebooting.

> hmmm, I wonder if you can install GenToo in a chrooted
> environment...ie, build LFS, then chroot to the LFS base install and
> install GenToo.
> 

This sound incredibly hokey!!!  And the reason you would want to try
installing gentoo using a doubly chrooted environment from LFS is???

Gentoo always installs using a chrooted environment as does LFS, but
why on earth would you want to use one or the other to install the
other one?

If you want LFS or gentoo, set yourself up a partition for each,
install each from your running system using a spare tty, and alter
your lilo/grup setup after the installs are complete.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD? - Code Python
gentoo(since 01/01/01) now 1.4beta kernel 2.4.18+ ext3 GCC3.2
xfce-sylpheed-skipstone