Update GCC from 2.95.2: 2.95.3, 3.1.1, or 3.2?

[Tim Wunder]

Well, if you must know, I've considered GenToo, but I want something 
that I can get up and running fairly quickly, as I've other users to be 
concerned about. Once I have RedHat 7.3 running, I'll have another spare 
partition to experiment with. But I think I'll take a whack at LFS and 
BLFS rather than GenToo. That looks like it'd be more fun :-), and it 
can be built without rebooting.

hmmm, I wonder if you can install GenToo in a chrooted environment...ie, 
build LFS, then chroot to the LFS base install and install GenToo.

Regards,
Tim


On 9/20/2002 12:26 AM, someone claiming to be Tom Jandl wrote:
> How about Gentoo, Tim? It's fast & easy after the "pain" of the base
> install is over. My eWS 3.1.1 is permanently *nuked* 
> 
> 
> Tom Jandl
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Wunder" <tim at thewunders.org>
> To: <linux-users at linux-sxs.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Update GCC from 2.95.2: 2.95.3, 3.1.1, or 3.2?
> 
> 
> 
>>On Thursday 19 September 2002 10:03 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:58:41 -0400 Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org>
> 
> wrote:
> 
>>>>On Thursday 19 September 2002 09:50 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>>>My advice is... go back to the distribution cd, re-install all
>>>>>that
> 
> you
> 
>>>>>suspect is broken.
>>
>>arggg! Installing the glibc2.2.4 rpms from eW3.1.1 resulted in an
>>unusable system, repaired with the linuxcare emergency boot disk
>>(thanks Lonnie).
>>
>>I give up...
>>RedHat 7.3, here I come.
>>Many thanks to those who've tried to help me thru this.
>>
<snip>