Update GCC from 2.95.2: 2.95.3, 3.1.1, or 3.2?

[Jerry McBride]

Tim,

If you suspect your gcc or glibc  is broken in some manor... what makes you
think you can recompiled a new version and produce a correctly working copy?

My advice is... go back to the distribution cd, re-install all that you suspect
is broken. If you reinstall glibc, it's best to shutdown and restart before you
do much else with your setup...

That said, I found the kde 2.2.2 source tarballs at ftp.rutgers.org. If any one
here needs or would like a complete copy, just ask.

I'm recompiling the sources with the newer objprelink-2 and using the combreloc
of ld... this ought to be a pretty fast binary, even on very old hardware. I
hope... :')

Cheers all.

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:40:35 -0400 Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org> wrote:

---snip---

> Well, 2.95.3 doesn't solve the problem.
> According to http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/glib-linux-archive/0110/0007.html, I 
> need to get the latest 2.95.4pre source and apply the referenced pathc. 
> Problem is, that link is rather dated, and, well, the patch will likely not 
> work on 2.95.3 source code. 3.1.1 should fix my problem, but I *still* can't 
> get that to compile.
> 
> If any kind soul wants to wander into #linux-users at irc.openprojects.net and
> 
> give me a suggestion on how to *fix* this, I'll be quite happy...
> 
-- 

******************************************************************************
                     Registered Linux User Number 185956
          http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
             Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
    9:32pm  up 191 days,  2:41,  6 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.04, 1.10