EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)
Richard R. Sivernell
res005ru
Mon May 17 11:37:49 PDT 2004
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:06:34 +0200
Roger Oberholtzer <roger at opq.se> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:58:12 -0500
> "Richard R. Sivernell" <res005ru at gte.net> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that you not use C, but C++ as this is much better for the
> > reusability
> > of source code. C is old coding. C++ is going to give you the greatest
> > speed after ass
> > lang.
>
> Ummm...
>
> No flame war here (please!), but this is all (I think) a matter of coding
> style. I have seen lots of C++ code that was so bad I would hate to suggest
> it be reused. And some C code that has a decent API so that it can easily be
> reused. Not in the C++ sense, but in a pratical sense.
>
> I just had to comment. I will say no more.
>
Roger
You are absolutely correct, they are turning out Cop Si people who can not
write code
nor do they know how to lay it out. I know I have had to fix a lot of it. But
properly
written not only syntax, but for rock solid use, makes all the arguments for it
proper.
Other than that C++ will be pile of over stuffed crap. No flame here, I just
understand
what you are saying.
Cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
res005ru at gte.net
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered Linux User
.~.
/ v \
/( _ )\
^ ^
In Linux we trust!
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list