EDI in linux

[Douglas J Hunley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

mpdickens spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> As you have pointed out, the issue is not so much edi, but the number
> of programmers that are needed to produce a working product... For what
> it's worth, the reason I have been looking at existing products has been
> to determine the structure of the framework of the various solutions so
> I could determine what (If any...) common denominations exist between
> them (Other than the edi standard itself). In my opinion, the language
> that is choosen to write an edi solution is not as important as the
> ability to use the edi solution that you create with just about any
> existing accounting/office automation solution. Needless to say, this is
> a tall order that would require a lot of individual product knowledge
> and many programmers...

I spent 2 years deep in Steling's Gentran:Server. I could help with describing 
their systgem and all the issues we had in implementing it and what we needed 
to extend it with.
- -- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
	and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

Don't underestimate the power of survival of the fittest
	- Linus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9hhWESrrWWknCnMIRAh+eAKCL/keGVXzKJGhFZmNrfqeKGSKp3wCfYakm
BW9oF4Qy7ElXWSTGl3eumGU=
=2z32
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----