SCO Unix and ntpdate
Joel Hammer
Joel
Mon May 17 11:34:41 PDT 2004
No solutions, just some observations. I don't use w2k.
This is from the documentation for ntp:
ntpdate: Directory containing sources for a program to set the
local machine time from one or more remote machines running NTP.
Operates like rdate, but much more accurate.
I can get your error when I run ntpdate against an XP pro box and against a
linux box which is not running ntp. But, it works fine with a linux box
running xntpd. However, when I turned off the xntp daemon, then
turned it back on, it took several minutes for the server to come up to full
speed before it started to accept requests from ntpdate from my client, even
though xntpd was running fine on the server.
So, is the Win2K server running the ntp daemon? Do any other clients
connect successfully? Maybe it is running a timeserver daemon on port 37? (rfc 868).
Do you have the equivalent of netstat -anp on the win2k box?
ntp can be configured to serve only certain hosts or networks. How is the
win2k box configured?
Also I might ask, why do you want to run ntpdate? Why not just run the
xntpd daemon on your Unix box and be syncronized to within milliseconds?
Once it is set up, it works without any problems (so far.)
Joel
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:45:55PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> have been asked by IT to help them with a Unix system they have. It's SCO
> Unix (uname -a gives UNIX_SV, 4.2mp 2.1.3 i686 x86at).
>
> They are trying to use ntpdate to synch with a Win2K server that is acting
> as a ntp server. For testing we ran ntpdate servername and get the
> message "No servers available for synchronization".
>
> 1. The Win2K server is in the hosts file and can be pinged.
> 2. DNS does work - I set it up and tested it.
>
> What does this message mean - does it mean that it found the server but
> didn't like something about it or can it not find the server? I also tried
> the -o option for ntpdate.
>
> In the process of troubleshooting we thought there might be problems with
> the network setup so we tried the following. This machine is no a network
> with a mask of 255.255.252.0 as is the server it's trying to get to.
>
> 1. First I tried the admin tools to set the netmask by selecting other and
> putting in the mask. When the system was restarted it wouldn't talk to
> anything and trying to change the route settings via the admin tool gave a
> "there's an error - see your administrator" - I was the administrator - let
> me in to fix it! -but using ifconfig to change the netmask and doing a
> down, then up on the interface allowed us to connect. However, the changes
> made by ifconfig did not stick during reboots. What's going on here?
>
> 2. We tried to add the route -n default nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn 1 for the default
> gate way. The route command didn't give an error but nothing changed in
> the routing table as listed by netstat -r.
>
> 3. The route command will give "To fix" errors on many of the commands
> such as add or delete listed in the man page. What is it trying to tell
> me? As far as I could tell the syntax was correct.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> --
> Brett I. Holcomb
> bholcomb at R777cableone.net
> AKA Grunt <><
> Registered Linux User #188143
> Remove R777 to email
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list