skipstone

[Ken Moffat]

Collins wrote:

>A user on the xfce group pointed out this browser as an alternative to
>galeon.  Like galeon, it uses the mozilla/gecko engine, but it doesn't
>require gnome.  As a result it requires about 25% less memory
>resources.  It does provide good tabbed window support.  It's a little
>slower at page rendering than galeon, however.  It also appears to be
>a moving target, i.e. under heavy development.
>
>Enjoy,
>  
>
Interesting. Although i like galeon, skipstone appears to work, and work 
quite well. Since it uses the mozilla engine, I assume it handles frames 
and other features like mozilla (quite well). Have you found 
disfunctional features you'd expect to work?