Clueless Network Prob

[Matthew Carpenter]

You, you fix this by having only one adaptor per subnet.  If you really
want to have the box dually-connected, plug each interface into a
different subnet.

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:17:04 -0500
"Michael Hipp" <mhipp at redmule.com> wrote:

> Thanks Net Llama!
> 
> I corrected a problem of wrong gateway and now am down to this (route
> -n): Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref   
> UseIface 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0 
>       0 eth1
> 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
> eth1 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0     
>   0 lo
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.0.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
> eth0
> 
> A nearby Red Hat box with only one eth looks like this:
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref   
> UseIface 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0 
>       0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
> lo 0.0.0.0         192.168.0.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0       
> 0 eth0
> 
> Should there be 2 lines per eth? Do you fix it by doing 'route add' and 
> 'route del'.
> 
> Any help appreciated,
> Michael
> 
> On Friday 21 June 2002 08:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> > Look at your routing table (route -n).  That is where all of the
> > problems lie.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list -
> http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
> above URL.