a crackpot idea i had

[Tony Alfrey]

On Monday 13 May 2002 06:38 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
> On Monday 13 May 2002 14:02, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 May 2002 08:01 pm,dep wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > a modern distribution based on 2.4, with
> > > everything simply updated to newer stuff.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Isn't that what 3.1 was supposed to be?
>
> It was! but did not turn out that way.

So what is really involved?  Is it easier to "fix" 3.1 or start from 
2.4?  Most of us have already added lots of upgrades of one kind or 
another to 2.4.  What is the fundamental difference that was supposed 
to have been made to 3.1?

-- 
Tony Alfrey
tonyalfrey at earthlink.net
"I'd rather be sailing"