suse 8 article

[Glenn Williams]

The article header simply says, "SuSE 8.0 arrives without StarOffice."
In the second paragraph it mentions that SsSE "...decided against
including SO 6.0 after Sun began charging fees for the software."

http://netscape.com.com/2100-1104-893089.html?type=pt&part=netscape&tag=
my&subj=technews

Saying "...ships without StarOffice" and "...decided against including
StarOffice 6.0," are not one and the same thing.  That's my point.

Regards,

Glenn Williams - n0hn at abq-nm.com
Registered Linux User # 135678 - since 1994
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Hammer" <Joel at hammershome.com>
To: <linux-users at linux-sxs.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: suse 8 article


> Are you sure? I thought the article said SO 6.0 wasn't being shipped.
> Joel
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:01:33AM -0600, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > What's up with the author?
> >
> > That article is really strange.  The mentioned article says SuSE 8.0
> > ships without StarOffice 5.2.  I installed SuSE 8.0 Professional
> > yesterday, and moments ago I clicked on the SO 5.2 icon on the
desktop
> > (installed by default), and SO 5.2 is being set up as I type this
> > message.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
above URL.
>