Networking Problem
Thomas A. Condon
tomc
Mon May 17 11:29:08 PDT 2004
Joel,
> OK. This firewall routing table looks odd. I don't know if this is
> your problem, however (see below). Who or what is setting up these
> routes for you?
>
> 1. 192.168.13.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
> 2. [ISP Connection] 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> 3. 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 4. 192.168.13.0 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
> 5. 192.168.13.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 6. 0.0.0.0 [ISP Connection] 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
> Line 1 seems to be pointing to the firewall machine itself. Why is it
> there?
> I haven't done point to point for a long time, so I cannot comment on
> your ISP connection
> Line 4 seems very odd. What does it do?
I removed lines 1 & 4. I don't recall why I thought they were
necessary.
> SO, ping from one workstation to the other. Then run arp -n on your
> workstation(s), and see if the other workstation is in the table.
> There may be an incomplete listing for the other workstation.
Right on both ends.
> If there is not a valid listing for the other workstation, just run,
> on your machine 192.168.13.5:
> arp -s 192.168.13.4 00:10:5A:0A:BE:F7
> and see if that updates your arp table. If so, fix the other
> workstation and see if that solves the problem.
I fixed both workstation and laptop arp tables using the arp -s
command, but still no joy. I do notice that both machines are
correct in the firewall's arp table. Also, both now have M set
the flags column for the other machine.
I'm running an ethernet (Cat 5, RJ45), with a hub, which should be
totally transparent.
In Harmony's Way and In A Chord,
Tom ;-})
Thomas A. Condon
Barbershop Bass Singer
Left Handed and In My Right Mind
Registered Linux User #154358
Vegetarian, a Native American word for "poor hunter".
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list