netscape 4.73 and 6.2 at the same time

David A. Bandel david
Mon May 17 11:28:04 PDT 2004


On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:23:13 -0700
begin  Collins <erichey2 at attbi.com> spewed forth:

> [ snips ]
> 
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:36:54 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <david at pananix.com>
> wrote:> On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 17:15:34 -0800
> > begin  Tony Alfrey <tonyalfrey at earthlink.net> spewed forth:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > Good luck with your web page. Don't forget about opera and that
> > > > other one, whose name escapes me right now (Internet Dominator or
> > > > something). There are also a couple of others. lynx among them.
> > > 
> > > The statistics that I've seen indicate that an enormous majority use
> > > IE  :-(
> > > Supposedly opera follows HTML 4.0 to the letter so I should be OK if
> > > I follow the rules.
> > 
> > Actually, if you're using CSS, it makes pages easier to read with
> > browsers like Lynx, w3m, etc.  It's only a problem w/ browsers that
> > don't follow the guidelines or worse are broken (i.e., they don't
> > ignore a style sheet command they don't understand, they implement it
> > improperly).  NS6 is the best, supporting CSS-2.  Opera also is good
> > and may also implement CSS-2(but at least understands CSS-1). 
> 
> Does the NS6 recommendation also apply to Mozilla and Galeon which uses
> the Mozilla engine.  Aren't all these basically NS6, too?

That would be my assumption.  Haven't tested these mind you, so can't say
definitively.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
		-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30



More information about the Linux-users mailing list