unitedlinux: it gets weirder

[Burns MacDonald]

On Thursday 30 May 2002 19:15, dep wrote:
> begin  Tim Wunder's  quote:
> | > no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop
> | > distro *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand.
> |
> | Hmmm...OK, I obviously read it wrong. I just read it again and it
> | appears that you're right. But...Well...that just doesn't make any
> | sense...
>
> which is why we put up an editorial entitled "unitedyawnix" after
> going over it all a second time. we need to understand that we are
> mere users and therefore not only of no importance but in fact to be
> avoided. after all, it was companies, not users, who created linux in
> the first place, right?

As far as I can see this appears to be led by the Caldera Marketing gaggle 
which, since the SCO merger, has demonstrated remarkable ineptitude, 
insensitivity and a complete lack of knowledge of even the basics of Linux -- 
or computing for that matter.

These are business dev and marketing drones with shiny loafers who know (or 
care) nothing about the technology... they are just bundling, packing and 
pushing for money, period.

-- 
burns