'vi' is driving me crazy

[A. Khattri]

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Tim Wunder wrote:

> But... you did say, "we just want you to quit the whining..."
> 1. You don't speak for the list.

I was merely agreeing with:
"Maybe I misread the posts. I read a lot of whining about how vi works."
(http://mail.linux-sxs.org/pipermail/linux-users/2004-December/061392.html)

And in an earlier message:
"If you don't like vi(m), try something else, and less whining about it."
(http://mail.linux-sxs.org/pipermail/linux-users/2004-December/061339.html)

Of course, no one took offense to those messages.

> 2. Michael was never whining, he just wanted to know if an alternative to vi
> existed that confomed to his usage habits.

Which was already provided by several people.

Im responding to absurd arguments about standards and how vi doesn't have
any.


--