#@!$ Red Hat and Fedora anyway

[David A. Bandel]

Regurgitating the prose of Net Llama! "Net Llama!"
<netllama at linux-sxs.org> on Tue, 07 Dec 2004 17:45:59 -0800:

|On 12/07/2004 05:36 PM, Collins Richey wrote:
|> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 20:04:11 -0500, Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks.com>
|wrote:> 
|>>On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:10:58PM -0500, A. Khattri took 19 lines to
|write:>>
|>>>On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Collins Richey wrote:
|>>>
|>>>
|>>>>Probably true. Neither have anything in particular to wean me away
|from XFCE.>>>
|>>>For me XFCE is too big too - I use ratpoison ;-)
|>>
|>>And I thought *I* was a minimalist.
|>>
|> 
|> 
|> One of our local linux enthusiasts swears by fvwm - lots of config
|> work but extremely flexible.
|
|That guy has to be really old school.  I've not known anyone who 
|preferred fvwm in about 8 years.

I was weaned on mwm which predates fvwm by years.  While I still like
it, it has a problem: dependence on Motif libraries.  I think it's
better than fvwm.  I now use openbox, which is a lot like mwm (or fvwm)
but a little more modern.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
		Nemesis Racing Team motto
GPG key autoresponder:  mailto:david_key at pananix.com