<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Kenneth Brody <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kenbrody@spamcop.net" target="_blank">kenbrody@spamcop.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 3/22/2013 2:35 PM, Ian Wood wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Okay, more fun discovered after our upgrade.<br>
</blockquote></div>
[...]<div class="im"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
We have a report that runs from a filePro file and writes out to a .csv<br>
that then gets pulled into an Excel spreadsheet.<br>
<br>
Silly me expected the same report running in dreport to have the same<br>
results in rreport<br>
<br>
The report runs as expected in dreport, but is missing information when run<br>
from rreport.<br>
</blockquote></div>
[...]<br>
<br>
Quick question:<br>
<br>
Do you run rreport with "-y" to override automatic processing, but did not compile the output processing with the same "-y"?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Kenneth Brody<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br>I have been around filePro since 1.0 days and have never had this issue arise. SMH. That worked for this instance.<br><br>Now I have to go through all my menus and all my batch files, again, and find all instances of rreport that have a -y associated and recompile.<br>
<br>Another question. What if I have the same output process that uses the regular auto process, yet elsewhere uses an alternate auto process? <br><br>