<html><head></head><body>I don't think so... I remember it being adverse ... But I could be worng..<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: monospace">On 1/24/2012 11:10 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:<br />[...]<br />> And more to the point, a federal circuit court -- no, I don't have the<br />> citation handy -- has decided that the Fourth Amendment does *not* protect<br />> you from having data seized when it's in the hands of a cloud services<br />> provider. Whether it's possible to meet PCI or HIPAA, I'm not clear on.<br /><br />Are you sure you're not thinking of "U.S. vs. Warschack" where the Sixth <br />Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that e-mail stored with commercial Internet <br />service providers has the same Fourth Amendment protection and expectation <br />of privacy as letters transmitted through the US Postal Service and phone calls.<br /><br />Of course, things aren't always so simple:<br /><br /> <br /><a
href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/the-cloud-and-the-future-of-the-fourth-amendment.ars">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/the-cloud-and-the-future-of-the-fourth-amendment.ars</a><br /><br />-- <br />Kenneth Brody<br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>