<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
OK, I've figured out what part of my problem was. The report was being
sent to Printwizard to get converted to a PDF. This is done through a
queue on the file server which, unknown to me, had been switched to
disable mode somehow. My file naming system uses today's date to
isolate when a report was run since who would need more detail than
that, right? Well I didn't realize that the program was bringing up
the older reports and that the new ones were OK.<br>
<br>
So now I just have to figure out what was different in my programs that
kept the records from printing out properly.<br>
<br>
Boaz<br>
<br>
Jeff Harrison wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:416656.4637.qm@web50706.mail.re2.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">--- Boaz Bezborodko <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:boaz@mirrotek.com"><boaz@mirrotek.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I'm having trouble with a report. I'm re-running an
accounting report
that someone ran a week and a half ago, but I'm
getting a strange
result. One of the items in an associated field is
not being printed.
Each record can store a few GL numbers in associated
fields A1. The
report selects the records by invoice date and sorts
them by A1. The
report that was run over a week ago seems to have
everything correct,
but the report I'm running today has the associated
field missing on
just one record. Other records with associated
fields print out properly.
I have the exact same problem with 3 other records
that are exactly the
same in different months. (They are monthly
insurance payments
allocated to two different GL #s.) For some reason
the second
associated field on them also don't appear on the
reports for their
respective months.
The records haven't been touched in between the runs
and the only change
was indexing the selection to speed it up. But the
records are
definitely getting selected since the first
associated field appears on
the file. And the report is definitely printing
associated fields since
other records with entries in the multiple
associated fields are
displaying correctly.
What is causing this and how do I fix it?
Boaz
_______________________________________________
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Hi Boaz. It is hard to answer this question without
knowing the specifics of exactly what you are doing
for sort/selection. What does the -v table look like,
what do the sort fields look like on the report? What
auto indexes do you have? What does the selection
table look like?
A telling statement of yours was:
...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">and the only change
was indexing the selection to speed it up.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Can you give more specifics here?
Jeff Harrison
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jeffaharrison@yahoo.com">jeffaharrison@yahoo.com</a>
Author of JHExport and JHImport. The fastest and
easiest ways to generate filepro exports and imports
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ">http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>