silence readonly messages

[Joe Chasan]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:07:48PM -0400, flowersoft at compuserve.com wrote:
> > i see what you are getting at and it probably would work, however this 
> > process table has 23 @key labels already and I think putting waitkey 
> > in @entsel is going to be a messy way of trying to get around it in 
> > this case.  
> 
> > -Joe Chasan-                           Magnatech Business Systems, Inc.
> > joe - at - magnatechonline -dot- com   Hicksville, NY - USA
> > http://www.MagnatechOnline.com         Tel.(516) 931-4444/Fax.(516)
> 931-1264
> 
> Why not just protect the fields on the screens and get rid of the -ro flag.
> or 
> @keyU   If:
> 	Then: end

the readonly scenario works well for everything except this.
1) @keyU is not the only @key or thing they could do modify file
2) there are all screens 0-9, plus lettered ones, its a lot to duplicate
and have protected versions of.  
 
--
-Joe Chasan-                           Magnatech Business Systems, Inc.
joe - at - magnatechonline -dot- com   Hicksville, NY - USA
http://www.MagnatechOnline.com         Tel.(516) 931-4444/Fax.(516) 931-1264