Questiona about printing with associated fields

[Boaz Bezborodko]

Kenneth Brody wrote:

>Quoting Boaz Bezborodko (Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:46:29 -0400):
>
>  
>
>>Kenneth Brody wrote:
>>    
>>
>[...]
>  
>
>>>Add a minor sort on A1 (or A7 or any of the A group) and place A1 and
>>>A7 on the report.  They will now refer to the corresponding entry in
>>>the record.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>But what if A1 has is blank and A7 has an entry.  This might happen if a
>>check pays off one invoice, but references 3 deductions.  Will only the
>>A1 with an entry print leaving the other A7s out of the report?
>>    
>>
>
>Correct.  If you sort by A1, then only the non-blank A1's (or just
>the first, if all are blank) will be included.  Also, from this
>description, I take it that order is significant?  In that case,
>this wouldn't work, anyway, as you would get them in sorted order,
>and not the order in which they appear in the record.
>
>--
>KenBrody at BestWeb dot net        spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
>http://www.hvcomputer.com
>http://www.fileProPlus.com
>
>  
>
Order isn't really significant here.  I just want to make sure that all
instances of A1 and A7 are printed.

What happens if I sort by A1 and then A7?  Will all instances be pulled
and show up on the report?  Will they be pulled multiple times for the
same @AF?  And, finally, can I do what I was thinking about with going
through @AF and using the PRINT command?

Boaz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.celestial.com/pipermail/filepro-list/attachments/20060919/f9be2948/attachment.html