filepro INDIRECT function
Enrique Arredondo
henry at vegena.net
Mon Jun 12 15:06:45 PDT 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Brody" <kenbrody at bestweb.net>
To: "Enrique Arredondo" <henry at vegena.net>
Cc: <filepro-list at lists.celestial.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: filepro INDIRECT function
> Quoting Enrique Arredondo (Tue, 23 May 2006 14:01:52 -0700):
> [...]
>> If you have on excel..... A1 = 1234 and on B1 = A1 and on C1=
>> indirect(B1) the C1 cell will show 1234.
>>
>> so in filepro language....
>>
>> import ascii imp(...... so imp(1) = 1 .... and 1 = "Porsche" in the
>> database, so If I want to export it to a csv file, What should I use
>> instead
>> of :
>>
>> export ascii out(...... out(1)=indirect(imp(1)) ... and out(1)=
>> Porsche.
>>
>> Do I make sense ?
>
> So imp(1) contains the field number that you want to export, correct?
>
> One way is to alias an array to the current record:
>
> dim fields[999]:1
>
> where "999" is really the number of fields in the record. Then, you
> can have:
>
> out(1) = fields[imp(1)]
>
> Of course, you'll want to bounds-check imp(1) first.
>
> Another way is via the FIELDVAL() function:
>
> out(1) = fieldval(-,imp(1))
>
> Note that the second method has some advantages. First, you don't
> need to bounds-check imp(1), as invalid field numbers will simply
> return a null string (""). Second, it can contain a dummy field
> name such as "aa", or system fields such as "@rn", and still work.
> If you want to make sure that only real fields can be accessed,
> bounds-check it to be greater than zero and less than or equal to
> 999.
>
> --
> KenBrody at BestWeb dot net spamtrap: <g8ymh8uf001 at sneakemail.com>
> http://www.hvcomputer.com
> http://www.fileProPlus.com
Please disregard my last email! I made a boo boo. Never mind.
It's working now!
More information about the Filepro-list
mailing list