Associated fields and @AF

[Jay R. Ashworth]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:39:44PM -0400, Kenneth Brody wrote:
> Quoting Jay R. Ashworth (Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:20:01 -0400):
> [...]
> > Very vaguely I seem to recall that your associated field has to be
> > called d0.  I had a similar problem to this, but it was long enough ago
> > that that might be the solution to some other problem.  :-)
> [...]
> 
> "d" and "d0" are, and always have been, the same thing.

Well, then, it must not've been that.

:-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me